Dear Fellow Owners,
You have received an email from the “SR Property Management” team claiming they wanted to allow online voting but were legally prevented because no procedure exists. This is a distortion of the truth designed to justify holding a physical meeting in Bulgaria in December, when they know you cannot attend.
Here are the legal facts regarding their claims:
The “Online Voting” Lie: Their Claim: We cannot hold online voting because Article 16(10) requires a procedure to be adopted first, and SRIOC didn’t send us one. The Truth:
They Control the Agenda: As the Convening Manager, they decide what is voted on. If they wanted online voting, they simply had to include “Adoption of Online Voting Rules” as Item 1 on the Agenda.
They Blocked It: By refusing to put this item on the agenda, they made it legally impossible to vote on the rules. They created the problem so they could blame it on the law.
Professional Responsibility: It is the job of the paid Manager to draft these rules, not the job of the owners. Blaming SRIOC is an attempt to deflect from their own failure to facilitate participation.
- Your point is being the AGM would need to get 51% to vote in online voting but you need these percentages for other items on your agenda, so you talk rubbish. So why didn’t you put online voting on the agenda and give ALL owners a voice instead of a few. What are you afraid of people having their say and vote. No, you want a dictatorship , a closed resort and everything in between so owners don’t hear the other side of what’s going on only your version.
- We didn’t call the AGM you and Boyan did so stop deflecting you wrote the agenda not the SRIOC
The SRIOC will see you in the courts. - On the “AGM’s invitations” and lawfulness
- Official invitations were sent in accordance with the law and posted at the entrances of the respective buildings in the complex, as required by the law.
- No, not official coming from you as you’re not the manager. So official invitation needs to come from the manager which is not you but Manol Manolov.
Owners should have received the invitation by email from Condo management which some owners did not receive.
The “Simple Signature” Trap Their Claim: Sign a proxy with a simple signature; no notarization is required. The Warning:
Under Bulgarian Law (Art. 14 ZUES), a simple signature is only valid if you appoint another owner or a relative.
If you appoint a third party (a friend, an advisor, or anyone not on the deed), a Notarized Signature is legally mandatory.
DO NOT send your proxy forms to the sunsetresortowners@gmail.com address. This gives the opposing party control over your vote and your data. Send them only to your legal counsel.
- Simple Give owners online voting and they can support vote and make their own decisions who they want and what they want for the resort.
- What you offer is no option just vote your why and yes to a dictatorship.
The “Moral Duty” Hypocrisy They claim a “moral duty” to inform you, yet they scheduled the most important meeting of the year for December 9th—a date that guarantees minimum attendance by owners. This is the exact same tactic used by the previous management (Boyan Bonev) to bypass your will.
You talk about moral duty is this you did in the pass when owners were taken to court over the years passing by the notices and not informing them you have moral compass. You only contacted owners recently telling them lies that they had to pay these fees and not offering them any legal avenues other than to pay up.
Why because you want money into your fund for next year. Owners we had contacts are not fooled by your smoke and mirrors.
Why when you were having your cosy Tuesday meetings with Boyan why didn’t you ask for 30 days notice for AGM which was agreed by him on numberous occasions and not 10 days before Christmas. We all know the answer you are not working for all owners and have no morals or integrity just want to be a dictator.
NO ONLINE VOTING ON YOUR AGENDA
NOT DIRECT CONNECTION TO UTILITIES ON YOUR AGENDA.
YES YOUR DEFINITELY WORKING FOR OWNERS OH SORRY ONE YOUR PUPPET MASTER BB.
WHERE ARE THE ACCOUNTS ON YOUR AGENDA AND ANNUAL REPORT FOR OWNERS TO CONSIDER IN ADVANCE.
WHY DIDN’T YOU PUT ON THE AGENDA THE ETA ROOF CHARGES BEING RETURNED AS THE WORK HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
AGAIN NOT IN YOUR INTEREST OR YOUR BOSS.
WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT BOYAN HAS SIGNED YOUR CONTRACT FOR A CLOSED COMPLEX AND HAS SIGNED UP FOR 22 SQM FOR HIS APARTMENTS AND COMMERCIALS.
WELL GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR ADVENTURES BUT OUR MEMBERS WILL NEVER AGREE TO SIGN
YOUR SLAVE CONTRACT IN THIS FORM AND LEGALLY YOU CAN’T MAKE US.
The SRIOC will send a detailed explanation of the law that IVA & Co is attempting to bypass in recent AGMs, not only from our solicitor but also from multiple legal firms, which can be easily verified on Google. Please do not be fooled by IVA & Co; they are spreading scare tactics and untruths.